손해배상(기)
1. All appeals by the Defendants are dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Defendants.
Purport of claim and appeal
1.
1. The reasoning of the judgment of this court citing the judgment of the court of first instance is as follows, and the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance citing the reasoning of the judgment is identical to that of the judgment of the court of first instance, except where the judgment is dismissed or added as follows.
- Parts - Not more than 4th page 1, “C, etc. has been using them in the course of the FDS development work” means that “Defendant B’s employees stored the said card customer information on a computer for business purposes and used the said card customer information in a way that they share the storage pool in the manner of sharing the storage pool.”
Part 4 through 13 (1.(c)(a)(b) of Part 4) of Part 13 (13) are as follows. (A) C became aware that while Defendant E Center conducts FDS development work, it could store files if it connects USB meta with no security program installed on the business computer that it uses while Defendant E Center performed its FDS development work.
B. C around February 2013, Defendant E Center copied card customer information stored in the co-owned brand at Defendant A E Center on its own computer for its own business without a security program, and linked to the above computer, Defendant A’s personal information in the name of approximately 5,378,00 won was copied to the above USB note.
C copied the above disclosed information at one’s own home, and then copied the information stored at the above computer on April 2013 to one’s external hard disks.
W set forth in Part 4 of the 7th sentence shall be written by cutting the “W” into V.
Part 8 of the 7th page "X" shall be added to "I".
The 9th parallel name of 17th parallels shall be cut to the 17th parallel names.
2. Additional or supplementary judgment
A. The Defendants’ grounds of appeal 1) Defendant A Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant A”).
(A) The obligation to take technical, physical, and administrative measures borne by Defendant A as a personal information manager should be limited to the extent reasonably expected.