The Defendant had weak ability to discern things or make decisions due to external stress disorder.

1. Around October 2002, the Defendant became aware of D, which had been engaged in the judicial examination division through a club, which is an Internet hosting site, from around December 2002, and around March 2003, the Defendant came to know of D, which had been engaged in the judicial examination division, as well as D, from the Gwanak-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City’s public announcement of the new forest dong. However, around November 6, 2003, D said D as “the Hague to concentrate on the secondary preparation for the judicial examination,” and said D said as “the Hague to concentrate on the secondary preparation for the judicial examination.”

Around February 19, 2004, the Defendant: (a) around February 19, 2004, without having been raped by D with F’s help for the purpose of having D criminal punishment at the F attorney’s office located in Seocho-gu Seoul, for the purpose of having D; (b) on October 26, 2003, D raped the complainant at the office of the complainant located in Gwanak-gu in Seoul Special Metropolitan City on one occasion; (c) on November 6, 2003, the Defendant discovered the complainant’s house at the office of the complainant and continued assault or intimidation, and subsequently raped the complainant on one occasion after continuing assault or intimidation.” (d) On February 20, 2004, the Defendant submitted a copy of the complaint to the public service center of the Gwanak Police Station located in Gwanak-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City, by submitting the above complaint to the police officer whose name is unknown at the public service center of Gwanak-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City.

2. On October 29, 2004, the case of rape, etc. against D by the Defendant who forged private documents or display private documents was prosecuted by the Seoul Central District Public Prosecutor's Office, and the Defendant appealed to the Seoul High Public Prosecutor's Office on December 18, 2004.

In the case of the original disposition decision and the appeal case filed by the defendant, the main issue was whether the defendant D was a chain of interest with the defendant or whether D was a unilaterally monitoring relationship with the defendant, and therefore, whether the defendant and D had been involved in Hong Kong travel as a chain of interest with the defendant.

The Makao shall forge the immigration seal of the immigration country.