If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

1. Around 00:30 on September 9, 2012, the Defendant: (a) committed assault against the victim on the road in front of the Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan City Cfold; (b) on the ground that the victim D (the 64 years of age) who is an agent for drunk, was late at the late arrival of the f4 years of age, following the victim’s obsing into “Esing” in the vicinity of “Esing”, following the victim’s obsing into “Esing”, the Defendant followed the victim into the “Esing”.

2. At around 01:05 on September 9, 2012, the Defendant, a police officer, working at the Seocho-gu Seoul Seocho-gu Seoul Seocho-gu Police Station G police box, sent out after taking a bath to D as above, and receiving a report to display drinking, the Defendant: (a) prevented the victim H, who was a police officer working at the police station of Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Police Station.

이에 화가 난 피고인은 D 등 수 명이 듣는 자리에서 피해자에게 ‘아 이 씨팔놈아, 좆같은 새끼야, 넌 뭐야, 씹새끼, 지랄하고 있네, 넌 모가지다. 짭새 새끼’라고 큰소리로 말을 하여 공연히 피해자를 모욕하였다.

Summary of Evidence

1. Legal statement of the witness H;

1. Partial statement of the police suspect interrogation protocol against the defendant;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes governing the statement statement made to D by the police;

1. Relevant Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 311 of the Criminal Act, the choice of a fine in regard to the facts constituting an offense, the choice of a penalty, and the choice of a fine;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. 가납명령 형사소송법 제334조 제1항 유죄의 이유 앞에서 거시한 각 증거들에 의하여 인정되는 다음과 같은 사정, 즉 H는 이 법정에서 피고인이 D에게 주먹을 휘둘렀고, 이를 제지하는 H에게 욕설을 하였다고 진술하는 점, 피고인도 수사기관에서 D에게 때리는 시늉을 하였다고 진술한 점(수사기록 제34쪽) 등을 종합하면, 피고인이 D에게 주먹을 휘둘러 폭행하고 H를 모욕한 사실을 인정할 수 있다.