건물명도
1. The Defendants are based on Section 1, Section 2, Section 3, Section 4, Section 5, and Section 1, among the real estate geographical strata listed in the separate sheet.
In addition to the purport of each statement in Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 3, the Plaintiff: (a) on May 4, 2012, the Plaintiff: (b) attached drawings Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 1; (c) attached drawings No. 34.45 square meters (hereinafter referred to as the "instant store") were leased to Defendant B on the following grounds: (a) on the top of the real estate geographical strata listed in the attached list, the Plaintiff acquired from the Plaintiff the instant store from around September 4, 2012 to the end of May 3, 2014; and (b) on the other hand, the Plaintiff acquired the lease contract No. 350,000 square meters (hereinafter referred to as the "instant store"); (c) from around September 2013 to the end of September 1, 2013, the Defendants were in possession and use by delivery from the Plaintiff; and (d) on the other hand, notified the Defendants of the instant lease contract and the management expenses of the instant case No.
According to the above facts, the lease contract of this case was terminated at that time by serving a notice of termination on August 10, 2017, stating the Plaintiff’s declaration of termination due to the delayed payment of rent in arrears in Defendant B, and the Defendants are obligated to leave the store of this case and deliver the said store to the Plaintiff.
Therefore, the plaintiff's claim against the defendants is justified, and all of them are accepted, and it is so decided as per Disposition.