When the defendant does not pay the above fine.

피고인은 서울 서초구 B 오피스텔 818호를 임차하여 ‘C’이라는 상호로 성매매 업소를 운영하면서, 인터넷 ‘섹밤’ 등의 사이트에 위 업소를 광고하고, D 등을 여자종업원으로 고용하였다.

On October 28, 2014, the Defendant: (a) around 20:00, around 20:00, the Defendant engaged in the act of arranging sexual traffic, such as arranging a female employee D to pay 120,000 won and arrange to do similar acts with the female, by allowing a female employee D, who has reported the Internet advertisement, to enter the said officetel as 818; (b) and (c) allowing a female employee to do an act of arranging the similarity, such as inducing a female employee, by receiving the price for sexual traffic equivalent to 1.20,00 won from a male customer from Jun. 28, 2014 to Oct. 28, 2014.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Written statements of D;

1. Application of each statute on photographs;

1. Article 19 (2) 1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. Selection of an alternative sentence of imprisonment and the concurrent imposition of a fine (Article 24 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic);

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Social service order under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;

1. Intermediation of types 2 (such as brokerage, etc. of commercial sex acts by giving and receiving, etc.) (one to three years) in the area of aggravation (one year) (one year and three years), advertisement character or high radio wave of the types of commercial sex acts subject to 19 years of age or older;

2. It is so decided as per Disposition for the same reason as long as the business size of the reasons for the sentencing is small and wrong, and there is no past record of the same kind of punishment and imprisonment or heavier punishment.