beta
(영문) 수원지방법원평택지원 2015.09.23 2012가합7405

손해배상(기)

Text

1. The Plaintiff:

A. Defendant B, C, D, E, F, G, H, I, J, K, L, and M jointly and the Defendant C.

Reasons

1. The following facts are without dispute between the parties, Gap evidence 1, 2-1, 3-1 through 3, Gap evidence 5-2, Gap evidence 6-3, Gap evidence 7-4, Gap evidence 8-9-4, Gap evidence 10-3, Eul evidence 13-4, Gap evidence 14-4, 15-3, 16-3, Eul evidence 17-4, 18-3, 19-4, 20-4, 2-1, 3-2, 3-4, 5-2, 3-4, 5-1, 3-2, 3-4, 5-2, 3-4, 5-2, 5-2, 3-4, 5-3, 5-1, 5-3, 5-4, 5-1, 5-3, 5-4, 5-2, 5-4, 5-4, 5-2, 5-4, 3-1

As the conclusion of a sales contract and the distribution of the purchase price, (i) the cost of Pyeongtaek-si AT was expected to be expropriated as a military unit site in around 1993, the Plaintiff, Defendant WXYBABABACFCHHHGM and 43 households, such as the Plaintiff, Defendant WXYAJAJAJAJHHHGM and net AQAVAVAP, and AR, who were living in the area around August 1992, constituted a housing site development council (hereinafter “instant promotion council”) and formed the housing site by purchasing land in Pyeongtaek-si AO around 193.

The members of the Council on Promotion of this case made the rules of the Preliminary Defendant AO Village Association (hereinafter “Preliminary Defendant A Village Association”) on March 25, 1997, and the Preliminary Defendant AO Village Association on the land purchased as above with the consent of all members present at the general meeting held around 09:30 on the same day with the consent of 27 members present at the members present at the general meeting held at around 09:30 on the same day.