When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won shall be one day.

The defendant is a person who has been a management employee of the DPice Center in Eunpyeong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government five floors.

At around 19:30 on March 10, 2012, the Defendant: (a) called the victim E (at the age of 31) who was engaged in a campaign at the above D Stice Center; (b) the victim E (at the age of 31), was tweeted by the victim; and (c) the victim was able to untweet the body of the victim who was sweeted that sweld by sweld by sweld, so that sweld by sweld.

The Defendant immediately followed the victim, followed the victim, laid the victim a room, laid the victim a fright, laid the victim a fright, laid the victim a hand on the every twit, and laid the victim a hand into a doping box, and laid the fright. The Defendant took charge of bucks, put the bucks and bucks into the hand floor, and put the panty part on the side of the drinking part, putting the bucks and bucks into the hand bucks, and putting the fucks into the panty part on the side of the drinking part, putting the victim a buck back into a bridge, putting the buck part into a bridge again, putting the buck part on the breast part into a bridge between 2 to 3 times.

Summary of Evidence

1. Legal statement of witness E;

1. Each police statement of E;

1. CCTV reading photographs within the DNA skin center;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports (the counter-investigation into the business owners of pice clubs);

1. Relevant Articles 298 (Selection of Punishment of Fines)

1. Where a conviction against a defendant is finalized in relation to the facts constituting the crime stated in the judgment on the registration of personal information under Articles 70 and 69(2) of the Criminal Act, the defendant is a person subject to registration of personal information under Article 32(1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes, and the defendant is obligated to submit personal information to a related agency

The judgment of conviction and the reasons for sentencing

1. Although the Defendant denies the facts charged continuously, the contents of the statement made by the investigative agency and the victim in this court are very specific and consistent and are not contrary to other objective circumstances.