어음금
1. The Plaintiff:
A. 50,000,000 won in the case of Defendant Note Cosmetics Co., Ltd. and the following:
B. The defendant corporation.
1. The Plaintiff, as the final holder of each of the following promissory notes, demanded the payment of the amount at the place of payment within the period for each payment presentation, but was refused.
A promissory note note No. 20,000 won at a par value of 30 million won issued on May 15, 2015, the payee, the due date, September 20, 2015, the first endorsement Co., Ltd., the second endorsement, the Defendant Co., Ltd., the second endorsement, and the second endorsement Co., Ltd., the second endorsement (hereinafter referred to as “first bill”).
Defendant Ors Korea Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant Ors Korea”)’s face value of KRW 20 million at the face value of May 5, 2015, KRW 20 million, addressee blank, and due date of September 30, 2015, and KRW 1 of Promissory Notes Co., Ltd., Defendant Ors Korea Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “second Promissory Notes”). [Grounds for Recognition] without dispute, Gap 1, 4, and the purport of the entire pleadings
2. According to the facts of the above recognition, Defendant U.S. Co., Ltd., the endorser of the bill Nos. 1 and 2, is obligated to pay to the Plaintiff the total amount of KRW 50 million and the amount of KRW 20 million in collaboration with Defendant U.S. Co., Ltd., the issuer of the bill No. 2, the issuer of the bill No. 2, to the amount of KRW 20 million and the delay damages calculated at the rate of 15% per annum from October 31, 2015 to the date of full payment.
Although there is no evidence to acknowledge the fact that the second bill is not a transfer of endorsement to the plaintiff, the defendant's shares and the second bill is not a transfer of endorsement to the plaintiff.
Therefore, the plaintiff's claim against the defendants is with merit.