Residence

Reference domicile

To order the defendant to complete the sexual assault treatment program for 80 hours.

On February 3, 2015, at around 09:10, the Defendant worked in the front corridor of 000 "Tulsan 307", "0, the Defendant," and "0, the Defendant, as an employee, before approximately one hour prior to the introduction of the ship, the Defendant her pregnant ○○ (the age of 21) was the victim at first, after drinking the alcohol from the main station of the call or the trade name, and then drinking the alcohol to the above telecom, "the victim was flick and drinking the alcohol to the above telecom," and "the victim was flick and drinking the alcohol to the above telecom," and the victim was flicked one time by using the method of using the victim's left chest to flick with the second hand of the victim.

Since then, the Defendant committed an indecent act by: (a) entering the above telecom No. 307; (b) forced the victim who was seated in a sofash; and (c) committing an indecent act on the victim’s left chest on a single occasion.

The Defendant, on the ground that the said indecent act was committed by the victim, committed the instant indecent act, such as the victim’s refusal to complete and driving the victim’s chest by hand, and the Defendant’s hand frighting the victim’s chest, thereby causing injury to the victim, such as a fright dump, sump, sump, sump, sump, sump, sump, sump, sump, sump, etc. in need of medical treatment for about two weeks in consideration of the victim’s hair, sump, sump, sump, etc.

Accordingly, the Defendant committed an indecent act against the victim by assault as above, and committed an injury.

Summary of Evidence

(Omission)

Application of Statutes

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act and the selection of punishment for the crime;

Articles 301 and 298 (Selection of Imprisonment)

1. Discretionary mitigation;

Articles 53 and 55(1)3 of the Criminal Act (The following circumstances considered in favor of the reasons for sentencing)

1. Order to complete a program;

The main sentence of Article 16 (2) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes

1. Exemption from an order for disclosure and notification;

Articles 47(1) and 49(1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes, children and juveniles;

The proviso to Article 49 (1) and the proviso to Article 50 (1) of the Act on the Protection of Sexual Abuse (including the following recognized records):

In other words, the following circumstances: ① Defendant has no record of punishment for sex crimes; ② Defendant’s election for punishment

in this case, the execution of imprisonment, the registration of personal information, and the treatment program of sexual assault

It appears to have an effect to prevent the Defendant from repeating the offense to some extent only;

In addition, the defendant's age, occupation, family environment, social ties, criminal records, and risk of recidivism;

Benefits and preventive effects expected by the disclosure order or notification order of this case, and non-profit therefrom.

Comprehensively taking into account all the circumstances such as profits and side effects, the personal information of the defendant shall not be disclosed or notified.

There are no special circumstances to consider that there are no such special circumstances

Judgment on the Defendant and defense counsel's argument

1. The assertion;

The defendant and his defense counsel stated that the defendant delivered the victim's chest on one occasion within the 3nd floor of the youth of this case, but this was done with the victim's implied consent, and that the victim's chest was not involved or assaulted on the part of the victim on the part of 307 her mother. The victim's statement submitted as sufficient evidence against the facts charged of this case was ① prior to the crime of this case, the victim her talked with the defendant, such as drinking her her fingers and her fingers, and her fingers. The defendant suggested sexual intercourse with the victim, and the defendant proposed that the victim was sexual intercourse with the victim, ② the defendant was the chest of the victim before the crime of this case, before the crime of this case, the defendant stated that there was no other evidence that the victim did not talk with the victim on the part of the victim on the part of the defendant, ④ The victim did not appear to have any other part of the charges of this case, ③ The victim did not appear to have any other part of the charges of this case.

2. Determination:

A. The court may determine the credibility of the statements made by the victim, etc. supporting the facts charged, and thus record the contents of the statements in the witness examination protocol, such as whether they conform to the rationality, logic, inconsistency, or rule of experience of the content itself or conform to the physical evidence or third party's statements, and whether they conform to the witness examination protocol, such as the appearance or attitude of the witness who is under the influence of alcohol in the open court after being sworn in the presence of a judge, and the penance of the statements, etc.

In light of all the symptoms obtained by directly observing various difficult circumstances, evaluation of credibility should be conducted, and where the statements made by witnesses, including the victim, are mutually consistent and consistent with the facts charged, such evaluation shall not be dismissed without permission, unless there is any separate evidence to deem that there is no credibility from an objective perspective (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 2012Do2631, Jun. 28, 2012).

나 . 위와 같은 법리에 비추어 이 사건을 보건대 , 이 법원이 적법하게 채택하여 조사 한 증거들에 의하여 인정되는 다음과 같은 사정들 , 즉 ① 피해자는 이 사건 범행 전 피고인에 대하여 느낀 감정에 관하여 " 피고인에게 호감은 조금 있었으나 성관계나 가 슴을 만지는 등의 스킨십을 허락할 정도의 호감이 있었던 것은 아니다 " 라는 취지로 명 확하게 진술하였고 , 피고인과 모텔에 같이 가게 된 경위에 대하여는 일관하여 " 성관계 를 하기 위함이 아니라 피고인이 모텔에서 술을 더 먹자고 제안하여 그에 응한 것이 다 " 라는 취지로 진술하였으며 , 그럼에도 술을 사지 아니하고 곧바로 모텔에 들어간 이 유에 대하여는 " 당시 근처에 있던 술집이 영업을 하고 있지 아니하여 술을 먹을 데가 없었고 , 피고인이 모텔에 가서 음식과 함께 술을 시켜먹으면 된다고 하였기 때문이다 " 라는 취지로 일관되게 진술하였는바 , 피해자의 위 각 진술은 이 사건 당시의 정황에 비추어 특별히 모순되거나 상식에 벗어나는 부분이 없어 납득할 수 있는 점 , ② 피고 인의 일부 추행에 피해자가 반항하지 아니한 이유에 대하여 " 기분이 나빴으나 실수인 가 싶어서 별 말을 하지 않았다 " , " 별 생각이 없었다 " , " 술을 많이 먹어서 그런가 싶어 서 뿌리치면서 하지 말라고 하였다 " 라고 진술하였는바 , 위 각 진술에 비추어 보면 피 해자는 당시 피고인이 한 추행의 정도 및 그에 동원된 유형력의 정도가 비교적 경미하 여 굳이 반항을 하지 아니하였던 것으로 보이고 , 피고인의 주장에 의하더라도 피해자 는 모텔 307호실에 들어가서는 태도가 돌변하여 피고인의 추행행위에 대하여 항의하면 서 피고인을 꼬집고 할퀴어 상해를 가하였다는 것인데 , 이는 피고인의 추행이 피해자 의 의사에 반한 것이었음을 뒷받침하는 점 , ③ 이 사건 당시 피해자는 술에 취한 상태 였고 피고인과 피해자가 나눈 대화 전체가 특별히 기억에 남을 만한 중요한 내용들이 었다고 보이지 아니하므로 , 피해자가 피고인과 나눈 대화를 일부 기억하지 못하는 것 이 오히려 자연스럽다고 할 수 있는 점 , ④ 피해자가 피고인이 모텔 엘리베이터에서 피해자를 추행하지 않았다고 진술한 것은 피고인의 범행을 축소하는 내용이어서 , 이는 오히려 피해자가 이 사건 범행 당시의 상황을 과장하지 아니하고 자신의 기억대로 진 술하고 있음을 보여주는 것이라 할 수 있는 점 , ⑤ 피해자가 경찰에서는 " ( 피고인이 피 해자와 같이 ) 소파에 앉아서 마주보면서 이야기를 하다가 피해자를 밀쳐 피해자가 소 파 팔걸이 쪽으로 반쯤 눕다시피 됐는데 , 그 때 위에서 피고인이 어떤 손인지는 모르 겠지만 한 손으로 피해자의 왼쪽 가슴을 한 차례 주물렀고 이에 피해자가 피고인을 밀 치자 피고인이 피해자를 때렸다 " 는 취지로 진술하였고 , 이 법정에서는 " 피고인이 피해 자의 왼쪽 가슴을 만졌고 이에 피해자가 하지 말라고 피고인을 밀치자 피고인이 피해 자를 때리면서 밀쳐서 피해자가 넘어졌다 " 는 취지로 진술하였는바 , 위 각 진술은 피고 인이 피해자의 왼쪽 가슴을 만지는 추행을 하였고 이에 피해자가 저항하자 피고인이 피해자를 때렸다는 본질적인 부분은 서로 일치하고 , 다만 피고인이 추행행위 전에 피 해자를 밀어서 넘어뜨렸는지 , 아니면 추행행위 후 피해자를 폭행하면서 피해자를 넘어 뜨렸는지 여부에서만 차이를 보이는 것인데 , 이러한 차이는 이 사건 범행 당시 피해자 의 주취 정도 및 피해자가 처하였을 불안한 심리상태 등을 감안하면 충분히 발생할 수 있는 정도의 지엽적인 것으로 보이는 점 등을 종합하여 보면 , 피해자의 진술은 그 신 빙성이 인정된다고 할 것이므로 , 위와 같은 피해자의 진술에 판시 각 증거들을 더하여 보면 , 피고인이 공소사실 기재와 같은 범행을 저지른 사실을 충분히 인정할 수 있다고 할 것이다 .

Therefore, the defendant and defense counsel's assertion is not accepted.

Reasons for sentencing

1. The scope of punishment by law: Imprisonment for not less than two years and six months, but not more than fifteen years;

2. Scope of recommended sentences according to the sentencing criteria; and

[Determination of Type] In a case where the result of an injury to a sex offense occurred, the person who is at least 13 years old shall be injured or injured.

Article 1 (General Indecent Act by Compulsion)

[Special Escopic Persons] In the event that the degree of indecent conduct is weak (requirements for mitigation), minor injury (requirements for mitigation)

[Scope of Recommendation] Imprisonment of 2 years and 6 months to 4 years (the area of mitigation)

3. Determination of sentence;

In the crime of this case, the degree of indecent act and the degree of injury suffered by the victim are relatively not more severe. The fact that the victim appears to have deposited KRW 5 million for the victim and made efforts to recover the damage in his own name, and the fact that there was no criminal record for the same kind of crime is favorable to the defendant.

However, the crime of this case was committed by the Defendant with the influence of drinking alcohol by inducing the victim to drink, and committing an indecent act by force, and by assaulting the victim resisting it. In light of the method, mode, etc. of the crime, the crime of this case is very poor in light of the nature of the crime, and the victim is likely to feel a considerable sense of sexual humiliation and fear due to the crime of this case, and the defendant does not appear to have an attitude against the victim while denying the crime of this case. The victim was punished by the Defendant because the victim did not reach an agreement with the victim, and there is a number of criminal records, such as the victim's punishment, suspension of execution once, and punishment 14 times, etc., which are disadvantageous to the Defendant, it is inevitable to sentence the Defendant to the punishment.

Therefore, taking into account the following circumstances: Defendant’s age, family relation, criminal record, character and conduct, environment, means and method of committing a crime, motive and background of the crime, and circumstances after committing the crime, etc., the court should not impose a statutory restraint, taking into account the following factors: (a) the sentence is to be determined within the scope of the above sentencing guidelines; and (b) there is room for agreement with the victim.

Obligation to register and submit personal information;

When a conviction on a crime in the judgment becomes final and conclusive, the defendant is a person subject to registration of personal information in accordance with Article 42(1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes.

Fibibibio