Defendant

If A does not pay the above fine, 100,000.

Defendant

A was the representative director of B, and Defendant B was a corporation established for the purpose of real estate development business.

1. Where a defendant A project owner intends to use a building after completing the construction work for the building for which a building permit was granted or a report was filed, he/she shall file an application for approval for use with the permitting authority along with a report on completion of construction supervision prepared by the construction supervisor and a book

Nevertheless, on February 2016, Defendant A obtained a building permit from the permanent residence market outside C and two parcels, and completed construction works on the area 1,121.71 square meters on the ground, with the two-story above ground, Defendant A occupied the said house without applying for approval of use from the competent authority, without applying for approval of use.

2. Defendant B violated the above provisions with respect to Defendant B’s business.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant A’s legal statement

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to accusation and accompanying documents;

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning criminal facts;

(a) Defendant A: Article 111 subparag. 1 of the Building Act and Article 22 subparag. 1 of the same Act;

(b) Defendant B: Articles 112(3), 111 subparag. 1, and 22(1) of the Building Act

1. Defendant A to be detained in a workhouse: Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendants of the provisional payment order: Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act