2. Even if considering the circumstances, such as the fact that the amount of damage caused to the market is relatively small, and that the defendant is breaking his mistake in depth, such circumstance appears to have been considered in the original judgment and has been sentenced to reduction of punishment. In addition, in light of all the sentencing conditions indicated in the records of this case, such as the fact that the defendant had a history of criminal punishment several times for the same kind of crime, the damage recovery or no agreement was reached, the circumstances leading up to other crimes, the age, character and conduct of the defendant, family environment, and the circumstances after the crime, the sentence of the lower court against the defendant is too unreasonable.

3. The defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act, since the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.