(a) Outline of rearrangement project - Project name: Urban environment rearrangement project of B: Project implementation district: Defendant - Project implementation district of Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government - Public Notice of implementation authorization: Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Public Notice of February 17, 201

B. The date of expropriation on June 28, 2013 (hereinafter “adjudication of expropriation”): The date of expropriation on August 16, 2013 - Each land owned by the Plaintiff as stated in the column for “land subject to expropriation” in the attached Form “The details of expropriation” (hereinafter “attached Table”) (hereinafter “land subject to expropriation” shall be collectively referred to as “land subject to expropriation”; individual land shall be referred to as “land number only”) - Compensation: The criteria for calculating compensation for the Plaintiff, as described in the attached Form’s “adjudication of expropriation” on the basis of the arithmetic average of the results of each appraisal by the future appraisal corporation, the third appraisal corporation, and the third appraisal corporation: The criteria for calculating compensation for the Plaintiff based on the arithmetic average of the results of each appraisal by each appraisal by the third appraisal corporation: The current status of use of the land of 92.9 square meters among E-land as a site, and the remaining status

C. The Central Land Tribunal’s ruling on April 17, 2014 (hereinafter “the ruling”) - Compensation: Based on the arithmetic mean of the respective appraisal results of the appraisal evaluation corporation and the appraisal corporation for the stock company (hereinafter “appraisal”) (hereinafter “the appraisal of the objection”), the calculation of compensation for the Plaintiff as stated in the attached Table’s statement “the appraisal of the objection”): The evaluation criteria: The current status of use of the land of 92.9 square meters among the land E as the site; the remaining status of use of the land of 27.4 square meters as the road [based on recognition]; the facts that there is no dispute; the statements in subparagraphs 1 through 4; the evidence in subparagraphs 1 through 4; the evidence in subparagraphs 1 and 2 (including each number), and the purport of the entire pleadings; and the purport of the entire pleadings.

2. The appraiser for the appraisal by the plaintiff's assertion of objection shall assess the goods, etc., the value of the land to be expropriated, the correction of other factors, etc., and make compensation to the plaintiff.