However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. The Defendant in violation of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents is a person engaging in driving a CD car.

At around 23:00 on January 19, 2013, the Defendant driven the said car while under the influence of alcohol concentration of 0.169% in front of the modern iron B, which is located in the ec.g., the ec., the ec., the ec., the ec. B.

At the time, the E-Rad Automobile driven by the victim D (the age of 52) was stopped in accordance with the vehicle stop signals, and thus, the driver had a duty of care to see the front line to the person engaged in driving duties and maintain the safety distance while accurately manipulating the brake system and prevent the accident from occurring.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, while neglecting to do so under the influence of alcohol, found and operated the above car, but did not stop the vehicle, and saw the front part of the Defendant’s vehicle into the front part of the vehicle.

As a result, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim F. F. F. F. (31) who was accompanied by the Defendant’s driver’s vehicle in approximately three weeks of medical treatment; injury to the victim’s f.o.b. c. c. f. c. c. f. c. c. c. c. c. c. c. c. c. c. c. c. c. c. c. c. c. c. c. c. c. c. c. c. c. c. c. c. c. c. c. c. c. c. c. c. c. c. c. c. c. c. c. c. c. c. c. c. c. c. c. c. c. c. c. c. c. c.

2. Paragraph 1 applies to a restaurant where the trade name of the Defendant, at around 22:30 on January 19, 2013, is unknown, in a cafeteria where it is impossible to identify the trade name of the Defendant, who violated the Road Traffic Act.