On November 20, 2015, the Defendant promised to pay 50% of the construction cost and 50% of the construction cost, even though the victim completed the construction work and completed the construction work, the Defendant did not pay 104,340,000 won out of 134,340,000 won.

On November 1, 2016, the Defendant: (a) requested the Victim F, an E-operator of the Co., Ltd. Co., Ltd. Co., Ltd. to construct the said Co., Ltd. among the construction of the said Co., Ltd.; and (b) promised to pay the payment for the completed portion of the construction cost as of the end of each month to the Victim H, who is the operator of the said Co., Ltd. G Co., Ltd. Co., Ltd., the Defendant agreed to pay the payment for the completed portion of the construction cost; (c) even though the Victim F and H completed the construction, the Defendant did not pay the victim F Co., Ltd’

On January 19, 2017, the victim C provisionally seized the claim amount of KRW 104,340,00,00 in the amount of the above main apartment complex J, K, L, M, M, N, andO (hereinafter “instant six households”) owned by the defendant, and around January 25, 2017, the victim F used the above main apartment P, Q, Q, R, T, No. 5, No. 5, No. 5, No. 5, No. 5, No. 5, No. 5, No. 1605, No. 1605, No. 1605, No. 1605, No. 1605, No. 1600, No. 1605, No. 1605, and No. 201, No. 2016, No. 2016.

On February 3, 2017, the Defendant told the victims of the above main apartment sales office that “it shall not be sold or sold on the basis of provisional attachment to an apartment. On the face of the provisional attachment, the Defendant would pay the construction cost each time he sold the apartment and pay the construction cost at the latest until December 2017.”

However, the defendant only tried to release the provisional seizure by deceiving the victims from the beginning, and not only the victims, but also the amount of KRW 1 billion.