beta
(영문) 대구지방법원 포항지원 2015.08.27 2014고단1360

폭력행위등처벌에관한법률위반(집단ㆍ흉기등상해)등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[2014 Highest 1360] On June 6, 2014, the Defendant brought a dispute with the victim E (32 years of age) and tourists in the D office operated by the Defendant in Ulleung-gun C around 23:10.

Accordingly, F, who is a travelman, called the victim's tree, becomes the victim's bath to the F and becomes the victim's vision with each other, and F, once the victim's face is taken one time in drinking, and the victim was also able to see the F face several times in drinking, and it exceeded the congested floor of each other.

At this time, the Defendant saw the victim’s body that is above F, and entered the victim’s body several times in luxics for luxic acid, which is a dangerous object located therein, and entered the victim’s body at approximately 6 weeks of medical treatment.

Accordingly, the Defendant carried dangerous things with him, and jointly with F, inflicted an injury on the victim.

[2] On December 22, 2014, at around 01:20 on December 22, 2014, the Defendant driven a G rocketing car in the 1km section from the front side of the front side of the front side of the front side of the front side of the front side of the front side of the north-gu, Pohang-gu, Pohang-ro 13-1, to the front side of the new interest rate of about 0.110%.

Summary of Evidence

[2014 Highest 1360]

1. Each legal statement of witness E and H;

1. The second police statement of H about H was made by I, F, and H. Among them, I and F had a witness who had been working together with the defendant for a long time as a travel agent employed by the defendant as the president. In particular, F is a witness who has a friendly or consistent interest with the defendant, such as in the accomplice relationship with the defendant in this case. Furthermore, the defendant, I, and F made a statement at an investigative agency or this court (the defendant, I, and F did not consent not only to walk the victim's body that was in excess of the defendant's mountain shot, but also to walk the victim's body at the time, and F or I would be able to speak the victim.