However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date of the final judgment.

At around 01:42 on January 18, 2014, the Defendant: (a) was a member of the Ccultural Center located in Kuju-si; (b) had the Defendant’s fingerprints known in advance at the entrance of Ccultural Center; (c) had the Defendant’s fingerprints known; and (d) had the Defendant’s fingerprinted into the building; and (d) had the shock net installed at the window of the depository room of the said cultural center, teared into the building; and (e) had the c50,000 won in cash owned by the victim D; and (e) had one small-sized metal safe at the market price.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes concerning D police statements;

1. Article 330 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (The following extenuating circumstances among the reasons for sentencing);

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act of the community service order;

1. The scope of punishment by law: Imprisonment with prison labor for not more than ten years;

2. Application of the sentencing criteria;

(a) Determination of types: thief; thief for general property; thief for general property;

(b) Persons who are specially sentenced to punishment: The elements of mitigation;

(c) Scope of recommendations: Reduction area, eight months to one year and six months;

3. Determination of sentence: Imprisonment with prison labor for eight months, a stay of execution two years, a community service order of 40 hours [fluored circumstances], a person not subject to punishment, and the degree of damage is relatively minor [fluoring circumstances] and pleasure of the nature of a crime (fluoring things into a building in which the defendant is in charge of security service at night).