A Imprisonment with prison labor of one year and two months, and each of the defendants B and C shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor of six months.

However, Defendant B and C.

[Criminal Records] Defendant A was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for six months and two years of suspension of execution on September 7, 2017 at the Suwon Friwon, and the above judgment became final and conclusive on the 15th of the same month.

[2] The crime committed by Defendant A is a person who is an actual operator of G and H in the course of business, and is engaged in transportation business, warehouse business, packing business, etc., Defendant B is an employee of H’s business, and Defendant C is a person who is an employee of H’s business partner, and Defendant C is a person who operates Plaintiff I, a business partner of H.

No person shall receive a substitute payment or have another person receive a substitute payment by fraudulent or other illegal means.

Nevertheless, Defendant A requested substitute payment from the Korea Labor Welfare Service to the Korea Labor Welfare Service and received substitute payment from the Korea Labor Welfare Service after having a person who actually did not work at H due to the difficulties in the operation and financial situation of H H, and then conspired with Defendant B, Defendant C, and Defendant C, who were in a transaction with H, with the Korea Labor Welfare Service, to use part of the substitute payment, and to pay the price to H.

1. On August 30, 2016, Defendant A and Defendants B conspired with the J, Defendant B’s seat, and had the said J apply for substitute payment to the supervisor in charge of the labor affairs of the Jung-gu branch office affiliated with the Employment and Labor Affairs of the Jung-gu branch office affiliated with the Employment and Labor Affairs of the Jung-gu branch office affiliated with the 44th street due to the spread of the Gyeonggi-do Mayang-si, the Gyeonggi-gu branch office affiliated with the Korea Employment and Labor Affairs Office via K for the verification of false substitute payment, etc., confirmation of the business owner, such as the amount of delayed payment, written statement, written statement, and written self-statement, etc.

However, the facts revealed that J was not the employee of H, and that there was no money or valuables in arrears from the insolvent H Co., Ltd., and only the Defendants.