2. There are a number of criminal records of the same kind of judgment, and there are several times of repeated crimes depending on the same criminal records, which committed the instant fraudulent crimes once again during the period of repeated crimes, the degree of interference with business, and the victims who were punished among the victims, are also disadvantageous.

However, there are favorable circumstances such as the fact that the crime was committed in order to maintain the basic livelihood, the fact that the sum of the acquired money is a small amount of 34,400 won, and the fact that the crime is in depth against it.

In addition, considering the motive and background of the crime, the circumstances after the crime, the age, character and conduct, environment, etc. of the defendant, and all the sentencing conditions as shown in the arguments, the sentence of the court below cannot be deemed as being too uneasible and unreasonable.

3. The prosecutor's appeal of conclusion is without merit, and it is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.