However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On July 24, 2019, the Defendant: (a) withdrawn the money deposited in the Defendant’s account in accordance with the instructions of a person without the name, and purchased cultural products from a merchandise coupon store; (b) received a proposal from a person without the name, who became aware of the Internet job-seeking site B (hereinafter “C”); and (c) notified the Defendant of the number of bank account (E) in the name of the Defendant to pay KRW 120,00 per day if the fin number is transmitted by fin number by fin number by fining fin number by fin number.”

After the Defendant purchased cultural product rights in large volume, the method of delivering fin number only without delivering the pertinent cultural product rights in real form was not only the same example, but also the money was transferred in the name of victim F, other than the aforementioned d bank account in the name of the Defendant as follows, and the Defendant waiting to withdraw the deposit from the D bank to confirm whether it is a normal deposit withdrawal. In the process, there was a fact that the D bank made a statement on the prevention of singishing in the process, so the Defendant was able to assist the Defendant in committing the crime of singishing in name while intending to think that the money remitted from the non-name holders may be damage from singishing.

On July 26, 2019, on the part of 10:30 on July 26, 2019, the person under whose name the victim made a false statement to the effect that “the account in the name of the victim was stolen, and all of the deposit balance should be remitted to another account.”

However, in fact, the account in the name of the victim was stolen, and the nameless person was thought to acquire the money of the victim on the ground of fraudulent use.

On July 26, 2019, at around 12:14, 2019, a person who was unaware of name was instructed from the victim to transfer KRW 7.2 million to the above D bank account under the name of the defendant, and the defendant was instructed from the person who was unaware of name to withdraw money around 13:5 on the same day.