When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On April 4, 2017, the Defendant, at around 21:15, called the victim B (3) and the Defendant, who were satis in the Sora Park Park, Seo-gu, Daejeon, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Daejeon, about 589 U.S. (3) and the Defendant’s satat sat sat sat sat sat sat sat sat sat sat sat sat sat sat sat sat sat sat sat sat sat sat sat sat sat sat sat sat sat sat sat sat sat sat sat sat sat sat sat sat sat sat sat sat sat sat sat sat sat sat.

The match will be cut and cut.

The victim publicly insultingd the victim by referring to the same arbitr, human influence, and the same arbitr.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against B;

1. B written statements;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to arrest and report the occurrence of a case and investigate;

1. Relevant Article 311 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The finding of a mistake in the grounds for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the Provisional Payment Order shall be based on the following: (a) the circumstances favorable to the defendant; (b) the majority of the criminal records and the degree of insult are not less than that of the defendant; and (c) the sentencing data revealed in the records, including the age, sex, and circumstances leading to the crime, as well as the sentencing