손해배상(기)
1. The defendant's appeal and the plaintiffs' incidental appeal are all dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal and the incidental costs thereof shall be individually considered.
1. The reasons for the court's explanation concerning this case are as follows: "Defendant D" among the reasons for the judgment of the court of first instance shall be deemed as "Codefendant D of the court of first instance"; and "Codefendant D of the court of first instance shall be prosecuted for the facts charged by deceiving the plaintiffs and taking money by deceiving them as above and was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for one year and six months on May 7, 2015 (former District Court Decision 2014DaDa313)"; "the date following the last deposit" of paragraph 11 of the judgment of the court of first instance is as stated in the part of the judgment of the court of first instance except for the case where "the date following the last deposit" is deemed as "the date of final deposit", and this shall be cited as it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.
2. If so, the decision of the first instance court is justifiable, and both the defendant's appeal and the plaintiffs' incidental appeal are dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.