When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On July 29, 2020: (a) around 12:31, the Defendant: (b) committed a theft with a small-type bank in the market value, containing both B-dong parking lot in Guro-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, where the victim D (ma, 57 years of age) was set aside with a locking damage; (c) one stringer, one stringer, one stringer, one stringr, and one glare, etc., of which the victim D (ma, 57 years of age) was set off.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial description of the police interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. Statement of D police statement;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes governing CCTV external CCTV CDs

1. Article 329 of the Criminal Act and Article 329 of the Criminal Act concerning the crime, the choice of fines;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order denies the crime of this case even though the criminal facts of the defendant are clear, considering the fact that the fine amount of the summary order previously issued cannot sufficiently achieve the purpose of the punishment against the defendant. Thus, the punishment shall be increased based on Article 457-2 of the Criminal Procedure Act and the sentence shall be determined as ordered by the order.