However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. On August 18, 2018, the Defendant: (a) the victim B (57 tax) who is an acting engineer operating a motor vehicle of the Defendant on the roads near the Gunn Police Station located in Sinpo-si, Mapo-si, Sinpo-si, Mapo-si, 324, 16, and (b) the victim’s bridge was launched once again; (c) the victim’s bridge was walked one time due to the occurrence of the accident; and (d) around 23:08 on the same day, the victim was assaulted by the victim at the head of Sinpo-si, 89, Sinsan-ro, Sinpo-ro, Mapo-ro, Don-si, Mapo-si, Mapo-si, 324, the victim’s face two times.

2. On August 18, 2018, the Defendant: (a) demanded that D’s patrolmen affiliated with the military police box of the military police station of the Mapo-si, Sinpo-si, Sinpo-si, Sinpo-si, Sinpo-si, Sinpo-si, 89, assaulting a proxy engineer on the front of the 89 Mana-ro, Sinpo-ro, Sinpo-si, Sinpo-si, Sinpo-si, who was called out after receiving a report, “

” 고 하자 갑자기 도로로 뛰어가고, 이에 D이 이를 제지하자 발로 D의 얼굴과 복부를 각 1회 씩 걷어찼다.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning 112 reports.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against D;

1. B written statements;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes on investigation report (to hear statements made by victims and witnesses B);

1. Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of violence) and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of obstructing the performance of official duties) and the selection of punishment for each crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act on the suspension of execution assaults a proxy driver, and the police officer called out after receiving a report was also assaulted. In light of the contents of the crime, the responsibility for the crime is not easy.

The defendant has been punished for violence-related crimes.

However, the fact that the defendant both recognizes the crime and reflects the crime, and that the defendant has been punished in excess of the fine.