The Defendants did not pay each of the above fines.

D and E conspired, around October 19, 2012, around 23:30, 2012, the “F entertainment tavern in Gwangjin-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City,” D was the head of the above main place of business, and E was the employee of the above main place of business, who received KRW 200,000 from the above main place of business to engage in sexual traffic at H and the “Iel in Gwangjin-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City.”

Defendant

A and Defendant B, who is an employee of the Defendants, committed the act of arranging sexual traffic by engaging in the said business as to the Defendants’ duties.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. A protocol concerning the examination of each police suspect against D or H;

1. G statements;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of the guest room list (O. 19.19.1)

1. Articles 27 and 19 (2) 1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic, Etc., concerning facts constituting an offense, and Articles 30 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for detention in a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, each of the provisional payment orders;