except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. An open screening process for the first half of the year 2012 of the office of education in Chungcheongnam-do was conducted in the order of ① receipt of applications and documents (from June 27, 2012 to June 28, 2012), ② publication of a person subject to an essay-type evaluation (documents screening successful applicants, July 9, 2012), ③ essay-type evaluation ( July 14, 2012), ④ announcement of a person subject to an interview evaluation (as of July 20, 2012), ⑤ interview evaluation (as of July 20, 2012), ⑤ On-site evaluation (as of July 28, 2012), 6 on-site evaluation (as of July 30, 2012 to August 28, 2012), publication of a person to be selected (as of August 9, 2012), 8, 2013 (as of August 24, 2012).

D As a supervising official in charge of G affairs from March 1, 2011 to February 28, 2013, the Cheong-do Office of Education E and the Cheong-do Office of Education in charge of G affairs, performed overall management and supervision to ensure that the essay evaluation and interview evaluation can be conducted fairly in the overall process, including the determination of the number of persons selected in the field of open screening H, the evaluation of arguments, and the selection of members preparing questions, the management of the answer sheet, and the grading process.

As an assistant principal of I School, the Defendant was also a member of the 2012 open screening process specializing in education in the second 24th grade (hereinafter “open screening process”).

J was the principal of K School, L was the teacher of M School, N was the teacher of N School, P was the teacher of Q School, and R was the teacher of Q School.

2. From among the applicants in the field of open screening H, the Defendant selected as a member of the examination committee for the examination of the field of open screening H in order to pass the examination he/she knows (hereinafter “illegal applicants”), and was asked to pass the examination by informing the illegal applicants of the problem in advance.

D around July 7, 2012, it is known that the defendant enters the same time as a question question at the same same coffee shop near the Samnam-gu Busan Metropolitan City, Yong-dong, Yong-dong, Yong-gu.

The problem in China, etc. is known to be four problems and two problems in each field are to be established, and excellent applicants with the ability and qualities are disadvantaged.