However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

On December 28, 2007, the Defendant did not have a number of facts at the victim D’s house located in the Nam-gun C around the world on December 28, 2007, and even if the Defendant borrowed money from the damaged party due to no particular revenue or property, the Defendant did not have the intent or ability to repay the money, but the Defendant borrowed money from the injured party “a fee is being paid for the number of days within which the money is paid. The Defendant borrowed money from the injured party. The mother (name the injured party) is flick at the age of the mother (name the injured party).

‘Falsely speaking, it received KRW 130,00 from the injured party, i.e., KRW 130,00,000 from the injured party, from that time until February 27, 2008, and received KRW 19,630,00 from the victims on seven occasions, such as the list of crimes in attached Form.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of suspects of some prosecutorial offices regarding E;

1. Each police statement protocol with respect to F, G, H, I, and D;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the details of deposits and withdrawal, copies of bankbooks, details of transactions, details of deposits and transactions in I name, and details of deposits and transactions in D name;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Article 347(1) of the Criminal Act concerning the crime (as a whole, the fraud of victim G)

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the suspended sentence under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act [Scope of Recommendation] In the case where the mitigation area (one month to one year) [person with special mitigation] (the person with special mitigation] is not subject to punishment or where considerable damage is restored [the sentence], the victim is five, and the total amount of damage is equal to 20 million won, but the victims do not want punishment against the defendant under a mutual agreement with all victims, and the defendant is the first offender who has no previous criminal record and has committed a crime, and is against the mistake, the sentence shall be determined as ordered in light of the favorable circumstances, and the execution of the sentence shall be suspended.