A. Defendant B shall display 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 1 of the attached Form 1 drawings among the geological floors of the building listed in the attached list.

A. The Plaintiff is a housing redevelopment project partnership whose project implementation district is 5,523 square meters in Dongdaemun-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, and the Plaintiff obtained authorization for the implementation of the project on February 27, 2009 from the head of Dongdaemun-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government; the authorization for the implementation of the project on May 1, 2014; and the authorization for the management and disposal of the project on February 3, 2014; and the head of Dongdaemun-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government announced the details of the authorization for the management and disposal plan on February 6, 2014.

B. Defendant B: (a) the part on the ship (A) which connects each point of Annex 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 1 among the land surface of the building located in the Plaintiff’s rearrangement zone; (b) the part (B) which connects each point of Annex 1, 7, 8, 9, 10, and 7 among the land surface of the building indicated in the attached Table No. 1, 2, 3, 4, 9, 10, and 1 in sequence among the land surface of the building indicated in the attached Table No. 1, and the part (A) which connects each point of Annex 1, 2, 3, 4, 9, 10 and 1 among the land surface of the building located in the Plaintiff’s rearrangement zone; and (c) the part which connects each point of Annex 1, 15, 16, 17, 18, 15, and 14 among the land surface indicated in the attached Table No. 1, Defendant C and D are 13.

C. The Plaintiff filed an application for adjudication of expropriation with the competent local Land Tribunal in order to ensure that the Defendants did not reach an agreement on compensation for each of the above leased objects. On May 22, 2015, the said commission rendered a ruling of expropriation that, on the date of expropriation on July 10, 2015, the Plaintiff accepted each of the land and obstacles within the project zone, and among them, the amount of compensation for business suspension loss against Defendant B is KRW 39,530,000, the amount of compensation for business suspension loss against Defendant C is KRW 25,030,000, the amount of compensation for business suspension loss against Defendant C is KRW 20,143,000, and the amount of compensation for business loss against Defendant D is KRW 27,203,000.