2. The judgment of the court below is that the defendant is the first offender and all of the crimes of this case are recognized. The defendant is a favorable situation that the victim P (No. 1 in the list of crimes attached to the judgment of the court below; hereinafter only the sequences No. 1 in the list of crimes attached to the judgment of the court below, W (8 times), Z (8 times), AA (10), G (11), J (14 times), K (15 times), D (20 times), L (21 times), H (22 times), and H (22 times) are not subject to the punishment of the defendant. Although the defendant tried to agree actively on the remaining victims other than the above victims, the contact details of the records of this case were unknown, and it does not reach an agreement, it seems that the defendant does not accurately recognize the substance and the inside of the motor vehicle of this case.

On the other hand, in order to eradicate the Bosing crime, it is necessary to punish those who participated in the crime with strong punishment, and the defendant took an essential role in the completion of and benefit from the crimes of Bosing with the collection of money and deposit account, and the defendant is an employee belonging to a financial institution while collecting money from victims D, L, and H, and actively deceiving the victims.

It seems that there are 19 victims, the number of victims is considerably high, and the total amount of damages is very high as 250,2850,000 won, etc. are disadvantageous circumstances.

There is no special relationship or change of circumstances that can be newly considered by this court, and in full view of the defendant's age, sex, family relationship, circumstances of crime, and various sentencing conditions shown in the records and arguments of this case, the sentence of the court below is too unreasonable.

Defendant’s assertion is not accepted.

3. Thus, the defendant's appeal is without merit.