However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On April 2009, the Defendant sent money to the Victim F through E, which was introduced from D, which was known to the police officer, at a non-permanent location, and was introduced from D, on the first day of May 2009, to the effect that “A son was in prison in Thailand, G, a local citizen of the Thailand, has a high-rises and be in the Thailand, and G, a local citizen of the Thailand, must see through the separation of Thailand. If you deduction son, the Defendant sent money to the Defendant upon request of G to release her children who mobilized connection with G,” and the Defendant conspiredd with the victim directly in conversations with the victim on May 2009. Around that time, the Defendant used the above circumstances of the said G and the victim with the intention to obtain money from the victim under the following name of the victim:

However, even if the defendant receives money from the victim for expenses, etc., he did not have the intent or ability to release the victim's children.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, as above, by deceiving the victim, received KRW 1.2 million from the victim on May 14, 2009 via G’s foreign exchange bank account (Account Number: H) for expenses.

In collusion with the above G, the Defendant, from May 14, 2009 to September 11, 2009, acquired 56,90,000 won in total from the victim to the account designated by him or the above G through the above similar method as set out in the following crime inundation list.

On May 18, 2009, the remittance was made for the purpose of 1.2 million won in the account in the name of the foreign exchange bank account (H) account in the name of G on May 14, 2009, and the remittance was made on May 18, 2009 for the expenses of KRW 17 million and attorney-at-law on May 21, 2009.