2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

A. The Plaintiffs, J, and K (hereinafter “Plaintiffs, etc.”) are assimilated between L on August 26, 2002 (hereinafter “the deceased”). Defendant C is the wife of the Deceased, and Defendant D, Defendant E, and Defendant F are assimilated between the Deceased and the Defendant C.

B. Around May 2002 and around August 2002, Defendant C et al. completed the registration of ownership transfer on several real estate owned by the deceased. On September 4, 2002, the Plaintiffs et al. appointed Defendant G, an attorney-at-law, as an attorney, and applied for provisional disposition prohibiting the disposal of the said real estate by asserting that the documents related to donation were forged ( Daejeon District Court M and the same court N), and filed a lawsuit seeking the cancellation of the above ownership transfer registration (the Daejeon District CourtO, the same court N, and the above claim for cancellation).

C. On February 3, 2005, the above cancellation claim case was referred to conciliation, and the J, K, and Defendant G, the representative of the Plaintiff and the Plaintiffs, Defendant C, Defendant D, and Defendant F were present at the date of conciliation and the protocol was prepared as follows.

(hereinafter “Mediation of this case”). 1. The plaintiffs et al. withdraw the provisional attachment application for the claim provisional attachment case No. 2003Kahap888 of Daejeon District Court, and the provisional injunction application for the claim provisional attachment injunction case No. 2003Kahap1138 of the same court.

2.(a)

Defendant C, etc. shall jointly and severally pay 600 million won to the Plaintiffs, etc. by February 28, 2005.

B. Defendant C, etc. and P transferred 5% of the shares of Q Q Co., Ltd. to the Plaintiffs, etc., and implement transfer procedures therefor.

3. The Plaintiffs, etc., upon fulfilling their obligations under paragraph 2, withdraw their respective applications for provisional injunction in the Daejeon District Court M&D case and the court’s provisional injunction in the same court’s N real estate disposal prohibition case.

4. All remaining claims of the plaintiffs, etc. against the defendant C, etc. and P are waived.

The plaintiffs, etc. on March 4, 2005.