2. There is no significant change in circumstances that may be considered in sentencing favorable to the defendant after the judgment of the court below.

Even if the Defendant had been subject to punishment in 200, 2003 (2), 2005, 2010, and 6 June 2016 as a crime of violation of the Road Traffic Act, he/she committed the instant crime, and even if he/she had the record of the instant case and the reasoning of the lower judgment’s sentencing, it cannot be deemed that the lower court’s punishment is too unreasonable even if considering the circumstances required by the Defendant.

Defendant’s assertion is without merit.

3. The defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the conclusion is groundless.