업무방해등
Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.
When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.
Criminal facts
[2014 High Court Decision 168]
1. On July 31, 2013, from around 01:15 to 01:30 of the same day, the Defendant, along with B, frequently disputed the “E” restaurant operated by the victim D in Gwangju City from around 01:0 on July 31, 2013 to around 01:30 of the same day, and the issue of parking with the ordinary passenger, etc., and the Defendant and B, who was accused of having been punished by interfering with the victim’s restaurant business or by using violence, sent the victim’s restaurant at the victim’s restaurant at the day immediately preceding the day, and sent the victim to the district. However, at the night of the day immediately preceding the day, the Defendant sent the victim with the “unfavorable,” and the Defendant sent the victim a restaurant by blocking the entrance of the restaurant, and let the customer who was in the place of the restaurant run the restaurant, such as displaying the video with the cell phone.
Accordingly, the Defendants conspired to interfere with the victim's restaurant business by force.
2. On August 3, 2013, the Defendant found the victim’s above restaurant while under the influence of alcohol on August 21:3, 2013, and obstructed the victim’s restaurant business by force by driving force, such as her own ton truck between 10 minutes, seated on the part of the victim’s wife and her wife reported to the victim before being rejected.
[2014 High Court on January 10, 2006, the Defendant was sentenced to two years and six months of imprisonment for the commission of rape and injury resulting from rape in the Seoul High Court on May 17, 2008, and the execution of the sentence was completed on May 17, 2008, and the Defendant was ordered to attach an electronic tracking device for five years at the Sungnam branch of Suwon District Court on September 11, 2013.
No person subject to attachment of a location tracking device shall arbitrarily separate or damage an electronic device from his/her body during the period of attachment of the electronic device or otherwise impair its utility.
Nevertheless, on November 13, 2013, on the ground that around 23:20 on November 13, 2013, the Defendant answer a bridge attached with an e-mailed e-mail at the Defendant’s dwelling in Gwangju City.