모욕등
The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is erroneous in the misunderstanding of facts in the judgment of the court below, which judged that the defendant abused and insulting the victim, although the defendant did not have sealed the victim's shoulder or expressed the victim's desire to do so.
2. In the judgment of the court below, the defendant argued that he was not guilty of each of the facts charged in this case with the same content, but the court below rejected the defendant's assertion and found the defendant guilty of each of the facts charged in this case. In light of the following circumstances, the court below's above judgment is just and acceptable, and the judgment of the court below does not seem to have any error of misconception of facts as alleged by the defendant.
The Defendant’s assertion of innocence is based on the assertion of innocence that the victim does not have a face-to-face or a face-to-face page with the victim in CCTV images (round September 14, 2017, taken from around 17:33-35) submitted as evidence.
However, the defendant himself, however, stated that the victim was released from the train and that he was in dispute with E before the defendant's shop, and that he went to that place.
In addition, the testimony of the witness I, F, and B of the court below may be combined with the testimony of the defendant, the victim, and E in front of the defendant's shop and the victim's husband entered the family.
In particular, the mother E also stated that the victim was the victim when he/she went out of his/her place as the date and time stated in the facts charged.
Ultimately, the case recorded in the facts charged is deemed to have existed before and after the aforementioned CCTV images separate from the face of 17:33-35 on the same day. Therefore, it is difficult to deem that there was no case recorded in the facts charged based on the aforementioned images.
The statements of the victim shall be made.