도로교통법위반(음주운전)등
Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for a term of one year and four months.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Punishment of the crime
[criminal power] On February 21, 2014, the Defendant was sentenced to a summary order of KRW 1.5 million for a crime of violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving) at the Goyang Branch of the Jung-gu District Court on February 21, 2014, and on September 10, 2020, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of KRW 1.5 million for the same crime at the Seoul Western District Court on September 18, 202, and the said judgment became final and conclusive
【Criminal Facts】
1. Around September 5, 2020, the Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act and the Road Traffic Act (driving without a license) operated a vehicle B-Edidi vehicle without obtaining a driver’s license in the state of alcohol alcohol concentration of approximately 0.067% at the section of about 25km in the direction of the Gu, Yongsan-gu, Yongsan-gu, Seoul, from a place near the Yandong-gu, Yongsan-gu, Mangyeong-gu to the Han River basin near the Han River basin in Yongsan-gu, Yongsan-gu, Seoul.
As a result, the Defendant violated the prohibition of drunk driving more than twice, and simultaneously driven without obtaining a driver's license.
2. The Defendant violated the Resident Registration Act on the same day as paragraph (1) of this Article, and under the bottom of the Handong-gu, Yongsan-gu, Seoul, the Defendant, who was aware of the Defendant’s birth E resident registration number (F) that was the Defendant’s resident registration number, was the Defendant’s resident registration number.
Accordingly, the defendant used another person's resident registration number unlawfully.
3. The Defendant: (a) forged a private document; (b) controlled a drunk driving at the same time and place as set forth in paragraph (2); and (c) drafted a driver’s statement column in the Seoul Yongsan Police Station G G Ha and police officer I demanded the preparation of the driver’s statement column of the “the statement on the circumstances of the driver of the driver’s license” from the police station G G G of the Seoul Yongsan Police Station; (b) forged the said report by stating “E” in the name column and “E”; and (c) delivered the said report to H and police officer as if it was genuine, knowing that it was forged at the seat.
The defendant is therefore entitled to exercise.