When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

The defendant is a public educational official who is in office as a teacher in the first and fifth grade school and a sports teacher in the middle school.

At around 15:00 on June 5, 2015, the Defendant, in front of the classroom of the first-class 5th class of the second-class D Cmiddle School located in Kimhae-si, sent the victim E in the first-class 4th of the second-class 1st 5st 5th string in the school hours to the right side of the floor in front of the first-class 5th st st st st st st st st st st st st st st st st st st st st st st st st st st st st st st st st st st st st st st st st st st st st st st st st st st st st st st st st st st st st

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. Each police statement of the F, E, and G;

1. Medical certificate and photographs of the injured part of victim E;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes for investigation reporting;

1. Relevant Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act was that the defendant's act was attributable to the purpose of correcting the error of the victim.

Even if it is difficult to see that it has an objective validity acceptable by social norms in its method and degree: Provided, That it is difficult to see that a person has no previous offense except for a person who has been sentenced once to a fine due to a drunk driving, and a person commits a mistake, taking into account other factors such as the defendant’s age, character and conduct, family environment, motive and circumstance of the crime, means and consequence of the crime, and the conditions of sentencing as shown in the arguments, such as circumstances after the crime