2. Although part of the circumstances favorable to the defendant, such as the fact that the defendant recognized the crime and reflects the fact that he was punished for the same kind of crime, the above favorable circumstances appear to have already been reflected in the original judgment, the defendant, despite being aware of the fact that he was not obliged to subscribe to mandatory insurance, caused an accident while driving the vehicle of this case and caused an accident, including the defendant's punishment, and other various circumstances that form the conditions for sentencing specified in the instant case, including the defendant's age, character and behavior, environment, family relationship, and circumstances after the crime, it is not recognized that the sentence of the lower court is too unreasonable. Thus, the defendant and his attorney's allegation of unfair sentencing is groundless

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.