beta
(영문) 수원지방법원 안산지원 2018.06.21 2018가합5048

물품 인도 등

Text

1. The defendant (Appointed Party) comprehensive glass Co., Ltd., Ltd., and the Appointor D shall list the plaintiff A Co., Ltd. and B in the annexed list.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff A Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Plaintiff A”) and the Plaintiff C Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Plaintiff C”) are corporations with the objective of manufacturing and selling each glass product, and the Defendant (Appointed Party), the Defendant (Appointed Party), the Defendant, and the Plaintiff’s general glass Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant’s primary glass”) are corporations with the objective of manufacturing and selling glass products.

B. Defendant Gung-ri and Selection-ri are the owners of land E and F land (hereinafter “instant land”) at Silung-si, and the Plaintiffs were the owners or occupants of the unregistered factory buildings on which the instant land was not registered (hereinafter “instant building”).

C. Upon the occurrence of a dispute regarding the removal of the building of this case between the plaintiffs and the plaintiffs, defendant Ho-ri, and the designated parties D, the plaintiffs agreed on July 26, 2017 that "the plaintiffs renounced their ownership of the building of this case from September 25, 2017 to the defendant Ho-ri and the designated parties D, and that "the plaintiff Gap, Eul-B shall own the ownership of the building of this case, and it shall belong to the defendant Ho-ri and the designated parties D, and that the electric installations except the electric installations shall belong to the defendant Ho-ri and the designated parties D due to the reinforcement of the building of this case, and shall be used by the defendant Ho-ri and the designated parties until the plaintiff Gap and Eul brought about or disposed of the building of this case (hereinafter "the agreement of this case"). However, the plaintiff C shall confirm that there is no right to the building of this case and corporeal movables" (hereinafter "the agreement of this case").

Since then, in the case of demolition of the building, etc. in Suwon District Court support 2017Gahap5249, which was brought against the plaintiffs by the plaintiffs, 'the plaintiffs delivered the building of this case to the defendant Cho Man-ri and the Selection-party D by September 25, 2017, and deliver the building of this case, 1 set of 1 set, non-power-driven (non-power-driven pressor) and 1 set of electric installations (excluding electric installations by reinforcement and reinforcement) within the building of this case, and if the plaintiffs do not perform their duty of delivery, all facilities, equipment and facilities owned by the plaintiffs within the building of this case.