국가유공자유족등록거부처분취소
1. The Defendant’s disposition to deny the registration of bereaved family members of a person who rendered distinguished services to the State on July 11, 2018 is revoked.
2...
1. Details of the disposition;
A. On December 12, 1989, the deceased’s spouse B (hereinafter “the deceased”) was appointed as a police officer on December 12, 1989, and died on September 20, 2017 while serving as a patrol officer for the Posanam Police Station C police station.
B. On December 26, 2017, the Plaintiff filed an application for registration of bereaved family members of a person of distinguished service to the Defendant on the ground that “the deceased died due to the conditions of work in which the deceased was not influent influent 5, excessive work, sudden and excessive tension, interest and stress in the process of arresting new wall suspects,” and the Defendant on July 11, 2018 against the Plaintiff on the ground that “the deceased died due to the direct cause of the performance of duties or education and training directly related to national defense, security, etc., and thus, the deceased does not constitute the requirements for persons of distinguished service to the State (person of distinguished service to the State) but falls under the requirements for persons of distinguished service to the State (person of distinguished service to the deceased) since there is a substantial causal relationship between
“A person eligible for veteran’s compensation was notified of the determination of bereaved family registration.
The defendant's refusal to grant to the plaintiff on July 11, 2018 by bereaved family members of a person who has rendered distinguished services to the State (hereinafter referred to as "disposition of this case").
(i) [The facts without dispute over the basis of recognition, Gap evidence No. 1, Eul evidence No. 1 to 5, and evidence No. 7], the purport of the whole pleadings;
2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful
A. On September 20, 2017, at around 04:50, the deceased claimed in the Plaintiff, who was on the duty of coal force (from 14:00 to 09:00 on the following day), called up to 112 reports and served on his body during the process of arresting the suspect who was on the fluence in the D company, and was in the process of arresting him as a flagrant offender. The suspect was arrested and transferred to the police station, and the suspect was exposed to open color. At around 09:10 a.m., at around 09:10 a.m., he was found to have been fluoral resuscitation, and was sent to the hospital, but died in acute fluorial fluoral fluor.
. The Deceased.