성폭력범죄의처벌등에관한특례법위반(13세미만미성년자강제추행)
The Defendant’s motion to attach the instant attachment order is dismissed.
1. Facts constituting the offense and the grounds for requesting an attachment order;
A. The summary of the facts charged is that the Defendant and the respondent for the attachment order (hereinafter “Defendant”) reside in the F cafeteria operated by the E, the mother of the victim D (V), the five years of age), in the following City: (a) the Defendant and the respondent for the attachment order (hereinafter “Defendant”) have frequently taken the alcohol in the F cafeteria operated by the E; and (b) the Defendant have frequently taken the alcohol in the F
At around 10:00 on July 10, 2012, the Defendant committed an indecent act, such as attempting to detect the victim and to force indecent act by compulsion by force, by drinking alcohol at the above F cafeteria, who was seated in the ward where the victim was reported, sitting on his knee, standing the victim on his knee, standing the victim, gathering the victim on his kne, leaving the victim on his kne, leaving the victim on his kne, leaving the victim on his kne, leaving the victim on his kne, leaving the victim on his kne, leaving the victim on his kne, leaving the victim on his knel, leaving
B. The Defendant, as above, committed a sexual crime against a person under the age of 16 and is likely to recommit a sexual crime.
2. Determination
A. 1) The Defendant asserts that there was no indecent act against the victim at the time and place indicated in the facts charged from the police to the time and place indicated in this court. 2) The evidence on the facts charged in this case includes the victim’s legal statement and the police statement, the victim’s assistance G statement, the victim’s mother’s statement, and the police statement. A) the victim’s statement (the victim’s statement in this court stated in this court to the effect that “the victim did not have kid on the victim’s entrance and kis, and the victim did not have kid on the victim’s panty. The Defendant did not have kid on the victim’s panty.” The Defendant responded to the question where the victim’s panty was kid on the victim’s panty. However, the question on where the victim did not answer is “e.,” and there was a doubt as to where the meaning of “e., the victim’s answer to the question as “e., the victim’s appearance.”