If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

On August 16, 2012, from around 13:00 to 14:00 of the same day, the Defendant leased from the victim D (n, 54 years of age) in Seo-gu Incheon, and was operated by the victim E (n, 51 years of age) from the victim D (n, 54 years of age), and said that part of the site of the above third third third third third third third third third third third third third third third third third third third third third third third third third third third third third third third third third third third third third third third third third third third third third third third third third third third third third third party's land is included in the Defendant's land and parked in the entrance route in the Defendant's building, the above G third party, who is unaware of that third party, set up a fourth third party at the entrance corner of the above third third third party due to the passage of the above D and third party's entrance, prevents customers from entering the third party's automobile with a key to the victim, obstructing the left side side and the third party's injury.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each legal statement of witness D and G;

1. Some of the statements made by the prosecution against the accused in the suspect examination protocol (including the part concerning the statement made to theG);

1. Protocol concerning the police and examination of suspect by the prosecution against D or I;

1. Statement of prosecutorial statement concerning E;

1. Protocol of the police statement concerning G;

1. A death diagnosis letter and on-site photographs;

1. The Defendant and the defense counsel’s defense counsel’s assertion against the Defendant and the investigation report (as a result of the confirmation of the CD submitted by the suspect A), the Defendant and the defense counsel asserted that the Defendant did not assault D, and that G did not park a motor vehicle at the entrance of the third secretary general, and that each crime of the judgment cannot be acknowledged.

First, as to the injury, the evidence duly adopted and examined by this Court and the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence are consistently stated that D was subject to assault as stated in the criminal facts in the judgment of the defendant, and G is also the key to the last two.