When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

The defendant is a person who operates B 25 tons truck.

No person shall receive goods or other benefits from a designated maintenance business operator for comprehensive motor vehicle inspection or his/her employee, who has conducted a motor vehicle inspection, a motor vehicle inspection, a regular inspection or comprehensive inspection, and undergo an unlawful confirmation or inspection.

Nevertheless, on August 16, 2016, the Defendant received an inspection of the said vehicle from D Inspector E in Jung-gu Incheon Metropolitan City, and received an illegal inspection by paying KRW 90,00,00,00, including automobile inspection fees, under the pretext of passing the vehicle inspection even though it is impossible to pass the vehicle inspection due to the balk water leakage, the cover of the vehicle loaded, etc.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Copy of each police suspect interrogation protocol regarding E;

1. Application of the Motor Vehicle Registration Register, the results of comprehensive motor vehicle inspection, and the Acts and subordinate statutes governing the motor vehicle inspection;

1. Article 80 of the relevant Act concerning facts constituting an offense, Article 80 of the Automobile Management Act and the selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;