If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won shall be one day.

On February 12, 2011, the Defendant: (a) around 05:30 on February 12, 2011, at the C Office located on the third floor of B, the Defendant: (b) had a large number of computers, facsimile, audio appliances, etc. located there on the floor on the floor on the ground that D (Nam, 51 years of age) was recklessly disregarding himself/herself; (c) had a large number of computers, facsimile, audio appliances, etc. located therein; and (d) had damaged the market value.

The Defendant and E did not have any intent or ability to pay the price even if they are potable upon the order of alcohol or alcohol.

Nevertheless, the Defendant and E, around 02:20 on March 11, 201, by deceiving the victim as if they were to pay the drinking value in the “H” entertainment tavern operated by the Defendant and E, the Defendant and E had acquired financial benefits equivalent to the sum of KRW 450,000,000, 120,000, 120,000, 120,000, and 30,000,000,000.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each police interrogation protocol against the accused;

1. Written statements and photographs of damaged objects;

1. Application of G’s statements and simplified receipt Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant Articles 366, 347 (1) and 30 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of punishment, and the selection of fines;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;