Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one hundred thousand won shall be one day.

On October 18, 2015, the Defendant: (a) on the first floor of the D store located in C when lighting around 22:00, the victim E, with cash equivalent to KRW 1.30,00,000, stolen the victim’s property.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police with regard to F;

1. Application of CCTV Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant Article 329 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of punishment, and the choice of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Reasons for conviction under Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act against the order of provisional payment;

1. The defendant and his defense counsel think the above wall as lost property, and found the owner and forgotten it, and asserted that there was no intention of unlawful acquisition.

2. The following circumstances are not exempt from the foregoing argument.

① After discovering and gathering the above wallets, the Defendant did not leave the scene immediately, and the Defendant divided the conversation with the wife of the Defendant at the Samima.

② immediately after the instant case, the Defendant’s wife phoneed to the customer center of the new card that was entered on the wall A.

3. However, in full view of the aforementioned evidence and the following circumstances, it is reasonable to view that this case was proven beyond the reasonable doubt of the judge.

① The victim stated that shopping malls are stored in the D store and the other goods were carried out by the Defendant, and the CCTV photographs were carried out by the victim. In light of the above CCTV photographs, the victim’s cart can be seen that the goods are loaded.

Therefore, the defendant was aware that he did not leave the above store completely, but carried out shopping.

② The Defendant did not assign the above wallets to the employees of the above burial.

Even if there was no employee in the vicinity of the time, at least in calculating his own goods, the employee above.