2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

A. On April 28, 2016, the deceased C (hereinafter “the deceased”) as his/her father’s father (hereinafter “the deceased”) is a person who entered a company D (hereinafter “instant company”) to perform accounting, book-keeping, or other affairs.

B. On June 21, 2016, around 11:35, the Deceased (hereinafter “instant accident”) was discovered in a real condition from the stairs of the first floor of the instant company (hereinafter “instant accident”), and was transferred through the 119 emergency squad to an E hospital and received emergency treatment, and was transferred to the F hospital, but died on July 1, 2016, and around 13:08.

A death diagnosis for the deceased is written as a direct death stating “low oxygen brain damage” as a direct death.

C. The Plaintiffs asserted that the deceased’s death constitutes an occupational accident, and filed a claim for the payment of survivors’ benefits and funeral expenses. However, in light of the content of the deceased’s G, the Defendant did not clearly confirm the degree of dispute or dispute with superior when considering the details of the deceased’s G, the statement of his superior, etc., and the details of the additional work. The Defendant rendered seven or 19:00 overtime work after 18:00 on the commuting records from the date of the occurrence to the date of the occurrence in connection with the extension work, and did not confirm special circumstances related to the performance within 24 hours prior to the occurrence, and did not confirm the burden factors (such as the rapid change of work environment, the sudden increase in work volume, the excessive stress, etc.) to the extent that the applicant’s death caused the injury to the deceased’s injury, and thus, it is difficult to recognize the proximate causal relation with the deceased’s work and the result of the deliberation of the deceased’s injury to the deceased’s private person’s injury.

hereinafter referred to as "the case."