2. The judgment of the court below that the defendant led to the confession of the crime of this case and reflects on the fact that the victim does not want the punishment of the defendant, and that the victim committed the crime of this case while under the influence of alcohol and lacks mental and physical disorder, etc., are favorable to the defendant, or that the defendant was punished 21 times (3 times of suspended sentence, 18 times of fine) as an act of violence, and in particular, the defendant committed the crime of this case without being aware of the suspended sentence for the same criminal offense, and therefore, he cannot be sentenced again to suspended sentence, and the defendant cannot be sentenced again to a limited sentence for three or more years, and the crime of injuring a person with a deadly weapon has already been sentenced to a limited sentence for three or more years, and the court below sentenced the maximum sentence by again lowering it, and in full view of all the records and arguments of this case including the defendant's age, character and conduct, circumstances, the background and result of the crime of this case, and the circumstances after the crime, the above assertion of unfair sentencing is justified.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.