2. Where the defendant does not pay the above fine; 50.

1. On July 30, 2012, from around 23:05 to around 01:00 on the following day, the Defendant was ordered and supplied to the victim the sum of KRW 75,000, KRW 25,000, KRW 30,000, and KRW 20,000.

However, even if the defendant is supplied with alcoholic beverages, etc. from the victim, the defendant did not have the intention or ability to pay the price.

Accordingly, the defendant was given property by deceiving the victim.

2. The Defendant refused to pay the price to the victim C at the date, time, and place described in paragraph (1) and 1; the Defendant dumped the beer booms on the floor; and the beer’s disease.

was released.

In a series of times, the victim's disturbance was repeated, such as "copia, the elderly, and the drinking.", and the victim's disturbance was prevented from entering the above main points, thereby obstructing the victim's main business by force.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to C by the police;

1. Application of an invoice statute;

1. Relevant Article 347(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act and Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act and the selection of fines for the crime;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;