구상금
1. The Defendant’s annual interest in KRW 108,858,730 and KRW 41,119,610 among the Plaintiff, from July 5, 2016 to July 11, 2016.
1. In addition to the purport of the entire pleadings in the evidence Nos. 1 through 6 of the judgment as to the cause of the claim, it is acknowledged that the corresponding part of the cause of the claim was stated. Barring any special circumstance, the defendant is obligated to pay the money stated in the order to the
2. The defendant's assertion that the defendant's claim in this case was extinguished by the statute of limitations.
If the purport of the entire pleadings is added to the statement of evidence No. 7, the plaintiff obtained a favorable judgment against the defendant as the Changwon District Court 2005Kadan21800 on the claim claim of this case, and the above judgment is recognized as finalized on August 4, 2006.
Therefore, the extinctive prescription of the instant claim is proceeding anew from the time when the judgment became final and conclusive (Article 165(1) of the Civil Act), and the Plaintiff filed the instant lawsuit against the Defendant on July 5, 2016, before the lapse of the aforesaid ten years, and the Defendant’s assertion that the extinctive prescription has expired is without merit.
3. According to the conclusion, the plaintiff's claim is reasonable, and it is so decided as per Disposition.