Seized evidence subparagraph 1 shall be forfeited from the accused.

On January 25, 2013, at the “J building parking lot,” which is the residence of the victim I located in Jongno-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Jongno-gu, the Defendant told the said victim to the effect that “Around January 25, 2013, the Defendant would charge 4,50,000 mobile phone percentage points (one won per point) that can be used in an indefinite manner in the future, instead of paying off the mobile phone fare of 4,00,000 won in advance to B, and install a new vehicle landfill-type product free of charge.”

However, the above victim has to pay in advance the fees corresponding to the prepaid point on the K side, which is the above prepaid point provider, in order to use the above prepaid point. The victim must enter into actual telephone numbers and special characters after being installed after being granted the relevant prepaid point in the mobile phone. However, the defendant did not intend to pay in advance the fees corresponding to 4.5 million won of the prepaid point used by the above victim, and the above victim could not be used as the victim because he did not notify the above victim of the usage method of the prepaid point. Furthermore, even if the defendant charged the prepaid point and the above victim was known of the method of use of the prepaid point, the above prepaid point cannot pay in advance the basic fees that constitute a large portion of the mobile phone fees, and only can pay in currency, and the above prepaid point can only pay in advance, which is more than 18 won per average charges provided by the general mobile phone company as 33 won per 10 seconds, even if the above victim did not use the prepaid point more than the above victim's damage.

As above, the Defendant deceivings the above victim, and its affiliation from the above victim, is KRW 4 million in the street near the Seoul Jongno-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government “Korea Bank.”