1. Examining the evidence duly admitted by the first instance court, which maintained the reasoning of the lower judgment, in light of the evidence duly admitted by the lower court, the lower court is justifiable to have found the Defendant guilty of special robbery among the facts charged in the instant case on the grounds stated in its reasoning. In so doing, contrary to what is alleged in the grounds of appeal, the lower court did not err by violating logical

In addition, in full view of various circumstances, including the age, character, intelligence and environment of the person against whom the attachment order was requested (hereinafter “defendants”), and the motive, means and consequence of the instant crime, and the circumstances after the crime, etc., the determination of the lower court’s sentence, which maintained the first instance judgment that sentenced the Defendant to 13 years of imprisonment, cannot be deemed as significantly unfair.

2. With respect to a case for which a request for attachment order is made, if the defendant files a final appeal against the case for which the request for attachment order is filed, the final appeal shall be deemed filed.

However, there is no entry of the grounds of appeal in the petition of appeal and there is no entry of the grounds of appeal in the appellate brief.

3. Therefore, all appeals are dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.