beta
(영문) 수원지방법원 평택지원 2016.02.17 2014고단1817

사기등

Text

The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

Reasons

1. Facts charged;

A. On January 201, 201, the Defendant stated that “The Defendant borrowed the F apartment 107 Dong 204, which is the victim E’s residence located in Ansan-si, and that “The Defendant has to repay the amount to KRW 30 million with business funds to the victim within three months.”

However, the defendant did not have any intention or ability to repay the debt even if he borrowed the money from the injured party with the condition that the debt reaches KRW 100 million at the time.

However, the defendant deceivings the victim as above and transferred KRW 30 million to the Agricultural Cooperative Account in the name of the defendant around the 20th of the same month from the victim.

Accordingly, the defendant was accused of money by deceiving the victim.

2) On June 22, 2012, the Defendant: (a) falsely stated that “The Defendant lent business funds to G, who is a branch of the Defendant; (b) lent KRW 25 million to low-income earners after three months of payment; (c) however, the Defendant did not lend the business funds to the above G, but did not have any intent or ability to complete payment, even if the Defendant borrowed the funds from the damaged party, with the Defendant’s personal obligation having reached KRW 100 million.

In this regard, the Defendant deceivings the victim as above and was transferred KRW 25 million to the corporate bank account in the name of the said G on the same day from the victim.

Accordingly, the defendant was accused of money by deceiving the victim.

B. On October 10, 201, the Defendant: (a) called the victim’s phone in an infinite military unit located in Hongcheon-gun, Gangwon-do; and (b) called “I, a military vessel owner, lend money to I, who is in need of money; and (c) on the 19th day of the same month, the victim lent KRW 7 million to I and then remitted money to I’s account.

After that, the Defendant was from the I on January 2012.